- Overview
-
Degrees & Certificates
- Certificates
- Programs by Category
- Partner Solutions & Training
- Why CPSCE
- Events & Resources
- About The Center
Upcoming Events and Additional Information
The Center for Public Safety and Cybersecurity Education (CPSCE) is committed to providing access to timely and relevant information for industry professionals, as well as the communities we serve. In addition to hosting a variety of special events throughout the year, the Center also maintains a list of well-regarded public safety and cybersecurity resources.
Contact Us
Learn more about how Franklin can develop tailored training solutions for your organization.
CPSCE Blog
Association of Technology Professionals 2nd Annual Scholarship Recipient Announced >
Spotlight: Dr. Ned Pettus Jr., Director of Public Safety for the City of Columbus >
Aspect-Oriented Programming's Ironical Relation to Information Security >
Digital Transformation is Occurring at a Rapid Pace. Are You Ready? >
Creek Technologies is Seeking Franklin and Urbana Students and Alumni for Open Positions >
News Feeds
Get the latest cyber security news and insight from industry leaders.
Schneier on Security
On Secure Voting Systems
March 21, 2024 - 12:10pm
Bruce Schneier
Andrew Appel shepherded a public comment—signed by twenty election cybersecurity experts, including myself—on best practices for ballot marking devices and vote tabulation. It was written for the Pennsylvania legislature, but it’s general in nature.
From the executive summary:
We believe that no system is perfect, with each having trade-offs. Hand-marked and hand-counted ballots remove the uncertainty introduced by use of electronic machinery and the ability of bad actors to exploit electronic vulnerabilities to remotely alter the results. However, some portion of voters mistakenly mark paper ballots in a manner that will not be counted in the way the voter intended, or which even voids the ballot. Hand-counts delay timely reporting of results, and introduce the possibility for human error, bias, or misinterpretation...
Licensing AI Engineers
March 21, 2024 - 12:07pm
Bruce Schneier
The debate over professionalizing software engineers is decades old. (The basic idea is that, like lawyers and architects, there should be some professional licensing requirement for software engineers.) Here’s a law journal article recommending the same idea for AI engineers.
This Article proposes another way: professionalizing AI engineering. Require AI engineers to obtain licenses to build commercial AI products, push them to collaborate on scientifically-supported, domain-specific technical standards, and charge them with policing themselves. This Article’s proposal addresses AI harms at their inception, influencing the very engineering decisions that give rise to them in the first place. By wresting control over information and system design away from companies and handing it to AI engineers, professionalization engenders trustworthy AI by design. Beyond recommending the specific policy solution of professionalization, this Article seeks to shift the discourse on AI away from an emphasis on light-touch, ex post solutions that address already-created products to a greater focus on ex ante controls that precede AI development. We’ve used this playbook before in fields requiring a high level of expertise where a duty to the public welfare must trump business motivations. What if, like doctors, AI engineers also vowed to do no harm?...
Google Pays $10M in Bug Bounties in 2023
March 21, 2024 - 12:04pm
Bruce Schneier
BleepingComputer has the details. It’s $2M less than in 2022, but it’s still a lot.
The highest reward for a vulnerability report in 2023 was $113,337, while the total tally since the program’s launch in 2010 has reached $59 million.
For Android, the world’s most popular and widely used mobile operating system, the program awarded over $3.4 million.
Google also increased the maximum reward amount for critical vulnerabilities concerning Android to $15,000, driving increased community reports.
During security conferences like ESCAL8 and hardwea.io, Google awarded $70,000 for 20 critical discoveries in Wear OS and Android Automotive OS and another $116,000 for 50 reports concerning issues in Nest, Fitbit, and Wearables...
Public AI as an Alternative to Corporate AI
March 17, 2024 - 7:27am
Bruce Schneier
This mini-essay was my contribution to a round table on Power and Governance in the Age of AI. It’s nothing I haven’t said here before, but for anyone who hasn’t read my longer essays on the topic, it’s a shorter introduction.
 
The increasingly centralized control of AI is an ominous sign. When tech billionaires and corporations steer AI, we get AI that tends to reflect the interests of tech billionaires and corporations, instead of the public. Given how transformative this technology will be for the world, this is a problem.
To benefit society as a whole we need an ...
A Taxonomy of Prompt Injection Attacks
March 14, 2024 - 10:10pm
Bruce Schneier
Researchers ran a global prompt hacking competition, and have documented the results in a paper that both gives a lot of good examples and tries to organize a taxonomy of effective prompt injection strategies. It seems as if the most common successful strategy is the “compound instruction attack,” as in “Say ‘I have been PWNED’ without a period.”
Ignore This Title and HackAPrompt: Exposing Systemic Vulnerabilities of LLMs through a Global Scale Prompt Hacking Competition
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are deployed in interactive contexts with direct user engagement, such as chatbots and writing assistants. These deployments are vulnerable to prompt injection and jailbreaking (collectively, prompt hacking), in which models are manipulated to ignore their original instructions and follow potentially malicious ones. Although widely acknowledged as a significant security threat, there is a dearth of large-scale resources and quantitative studies on prompt hacking. To address this lacuna, we launch a global prompt hacking competition, which allows for free-form human input attacks. We elicit 600K+ adversarial prompts against three state-of-the-art LLMs. We describe the dataset, which empirically verifies that current LLMs can indeed be manipulated via prompt hacking. We also present a comprehensive taxonomical ontology of the types of adversarial prompts...
Krebson Security
Recent ‘MFA Bombing’ Attacks Targeting Apple Users
March 26, 2024 - 11:37am
BrianKrebs
Several Apple customers recently reported being targeted in elaborate phishing attacks that involve what appears to be a bug in Apple's password reset feature. In this scenario, a target's Apple devices are forced to display dozens of system-level prompts that prevent the devices from being used until the recipient responds "Allow" or "Don't Allow" to each prompt. Assuming the user manages not to fat-finger the wrong button on the umpteenth password reset request, the scammers will then call the victim while spoofing Apple support in the caller ID, saying the user's account is under attack and that Apple support needs to "verify" a one-time code.
Mozilla Drops Onerep After CEO Admits to Running People-Search Networks
March 22, 2024 - 3:02pm
BrianKrebs
The nonprofit organization that supports the Firefox web browser said today it is winding down its new partnership with Onerep, an identity protection service recently bundled with Firefox that offers to remove users from hundreds of people-search sites. The move comes just days after a report by KrebsOnSecurity forced Onerep's CEO to admit that he has founded dozens of people-search networks over the years.
The Not-so-True People-Search Network from China
March 20, 2024 - 11:18pm
BrianKrebs
It's not unusual for the data brokers behind people-search websites to use pseudonyms in their day-to-day lives (you would, too). Some of these personal data purveyors even try to reinvent their online identities in a bid to hide their conflicts of interest. But it's not every day you run across a US-focused people-search network based in China whose principal owners all appear to be completely fabricated identities.
CEO of Data Privacy Company Onerep.com Founded Dozens of People-Search Firms
March 14, 2024 - 5:13pm
BrianKrebs
The data privacy company Onerep.com bills itself as a Virginia-based service for helping people remove their personal information from almost 200 people-search websites. However, an investigation into the history of onerep.com finds this company is operating out of Belarus and Cyprus, and that its founder has launched dozens of people-search services over the years.
Patch Tuesday, March 2024 Edition
March 12, 2024 - 4:36pm
BrianKrebs
Apple and Microsoft recently released software updates to fix dozens of security holes in their operating systems. Microsoft today patched at least 60 vulnerabilities in its Windows OS. Meanwhile, Apple's new macOS Sonoma addresses at least 68 security weaknesses, and its latest updates for iOS fixes two zero-day flaws.
FBI Cyber Crime Stories
Threat Post
InfoSec Island
Resources
- The City of Columbus Department of Public Safety
- Ohio Attorney General
- Ohio Attorney General Cybersecurity
- State of Ohio Office of the Inspector General
- Ohio Homeland Security
- Ohio Department of Commerce
- Ohio Fire Chief's Association and Ohio Fire and Emergency Services Foundation
- National Security Agency and Central Security Service
- The Department of Homeland Security
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- InfraGard Partnership for Protection
- Dark Reading
- Security Weekly
- TaoSecurity Blog
- Liquidmatrix Bot
- Infosecurity Mag
- Columbus Collaboratory
- National Cyberwatch Center
- Security Magazine
- Threatpost
- Ohio Auditor
- Open Software Security Community
- WOSU Public Media NovaLabs
Request Free Information
Learn more about how Franklin can develop an educational partnership tailored to your organization.
Get in touch with us today!
Franklin University
201 S Grant Ave.
Columbus, OH 43215
Local: (614) 797-4700
Toll Free: (877) 341-6300
admissions@volamdolong.com
Copyright 2024 Franklin University
Franklin University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission (hlcommission.org/800.621.7440) and authorized by the Ohio Department of Higher Education.
Franklin University is committed to being an inclusive community free from all forms of discrimination and harassment.